Comparing FTMO with E8 Funding provides essential insights into their trading objectives, which is pivotal for traders in choosing a prop firm that aligns with their personal trading strategies and goals.
Key Observations: FTMO vs. E8 Funding
- Profit Targets: FTMO sets a higher target in the first phase, with both firms having the same target for the second phase.
- Maximum Loss: FTMO has a fixed 10% loss cap, while E8 Funding offers a more flexible starting point of 8%, scalable to 14%.
- Minimum Trading Days: FTMO requires more trading days, which may add discipline, as opposed to E8 Funding’s no minimum day policy.
- Profit Split: Both offer competitive profit splits, with FTMO potentially offering up to 90%, based on trader performance.
FTMO’s Standout Features
FTMO is notable for its:
- Two-phase evaluation program
- Reputation established since 2015
- Variety in evaluation accounts, including Normal and Aggressive options
These features may make FTMO a more attractive option for traders looking for a firm with a solid track record and a clear structure for progression.
Trader Preferences and Choices
The decision between FTMO and E8 Funding will likely depend on:
- Individual risk tolerance
- Trading style
- Profit objectives
Traders must weigh the pros and cons of each firm’s policies and decide which aligns best with their personal trading approach.
For those interested in exploring diverse forex funded programs, both FTMO and E8 Funding offer compelling options that cater to a wide range of traders.
